Is your Villain more interesting than your Hero?


There has been an interesting trend in literary media in the past few years. Villains are no longer allowed to have a simple motive like “I want to rule the world” or “I will revenge myself on everyone”. Villains are now shown to see themselves as the good guys; which only makes sense, when you think about it. A villain who is a human being should be a mixture of good and bad traits. It is the conflict this mixture creates that makes a villain interesting.

Think about the greatest villain to come out of the movies in the past fifty years: Darth Vader. When we first meet him, he is just tall, dark and menacing. As the series progressed, we learnt more about him. In fact, I would argue that the six Star Wars movies are more about Darth Vader than they are about anyone else, since he is a central character in all six. What makes Darth Vader/Anakin so interesting? We all know he has a kernel of good in him, and that in the end it is the good in him that wins out.

Disney is right on trend with Maleficent. With that movie, we are given a much deeper look at one of the greatest Villains in the Disney catalogue. This retcon of the original story has our wicked fairy as simply misunderstood, rather than evil to the core. The same thing happened to Frozen, with our Snow Queen no longer a villain but now an anti-hero. I actually like Frozen and Maleficent for presenting us with female hero/anti-hero duos at the centre of these stories, even though I was disappointed with the way the real story of Han Christian Anderson’s Snow Queen was completely obliterated in Frozen. (I would still love to see a Disney version of the Snow Queen.) Their complexity of characterization made the ‘villains’ more interesting than the heroes.

For some reason, storytellers feel they can give their villains some redeeming qualities (which makes their downfall also a tragedy), but won’t give their heroes a few flaws. This is why we all love Marvel’s Loki even though we want Thor to win (and save the world). Thor – as a character in the Marvel universe – isn’t as interesting as Loki. They’ve tried to make him more ‘human’ by giving him a human love interest, but he is still a much less complicated character than Loki. And even while we are cheering when the Hulk is waving Loki around like a flag, even after he has torn our hearts out by killing Agent Coulson, we still feel sympathy for this character. Thor is white bread; Loki is a fruit and nut loaf. I don’t know about you, but I prefer texture and flavour over blandness.

So, do you find that your villains are more interesting than your heroes? How can we fix that? Most Young Adult Fiction overcomes this by have an angst-ridden loner as the protagonist of the story. And another way is to give your protagonist a few realistic flaws. Something a bit more interesting than biting her biting her nails or having fly-away hair. You have to avoid giving the protagonist ‘flaws’ that are actually virtues-in-disguise, because a savvy reader will pick up on that. (And aren’t all your readers intelligent individuals with excellent taste? Of course they are.)

Look at Sherlock Holmes and his current popularity (not that he is ever really unpopular). Sherlock is seriously flawed. No one likes a smartass, and that is what Sherlock is. In fact, if you were to list his characteristics, you would find a lot of them make him an excellent candidate for being a villain … look to his willingness to bend the truth and break the law on behalf of a client, often lying to the police, concealing evidence, manipulating emotions of bystanders, or breaking into houses. He redeems himself by being completely committed to his clients, and by the warmth of his friendship with Doctor Watson.

So, don’t be afraid to give your protagonist some really serious personality flaws, so long as they aren’t repellent like cruelty to animals or setting fires in nursing homes. Not only will she have to battle the villain, but her own nature. By overcoming both, she will win not only the battle, but the hearts of your audience.



Filed under Characterization, writing, Writing Style

8 responses to “Is your Villain more interesting than your Hero?

  1. For a long time I avoided ‘The Villain’, – or made him remote/ cliched/ cardboard-thin. Most of my books had no villain at all. The ‘antagonist’ was simply the situation.

    The one place I did introduce a villain – he was called ‘Kruel’ and was really big and scary and powerful and angry and commanded a huge fleet of battle starships and really hated ‘the empire’ – he turned out to be the good guy! (At least in terms of his justification and success to date.)

    The other thing I avoided was the classic must-have scene in *every* movie: the Final Stand-off (between protagonist and the ‘Big Bad’). Believe it or not, I tackled my first one only recently in my latest book “Into the Heart Of Varste” (yes, it’s Steampunk, people!).

    Tossing in a villain, I’ve always said, is the easy way to make a story.

    But now I’ve written a whole string of villains, and they keep getting better. More complex. More tragic. But no less scary or despicable.

    What to do? Keep story-telling simple (simplistic), or create characters that are complex and human (and are thus on an arc towards redemption, and consequently suffer from ‘villain decay’)?

    I think it’s a healthy sign, but watch out! The world’s media is tirelessly working it backwards. It suits the powers-that-be to create villains – nice black & white villains – to be ‘The Enemy’,and then to justify various wars and a rash of sanctioned (and sanctified) murder.

  2. I agree – flawed heroes are far more interesting! I love the fact that Sherlock is such an unconventional hero, like you said, and at times seems closer to being a villain. He even says at one point: “I’m not a hero, I’m a high functioning sociopath” (I love that line). His actions at the end of the third season were not those I’d expect from a hero, let alone a detective… but I found myself loving his character more than ever before.

  3. Ha! I agree, Loki is much more interesting than Thor is. But I still don’t get why we are drawn towards characters who are mysterious and often flawed (except if the flaw is that of being an insufferable know-it-all). That’s the reason I like Iron Man more than Captain America. But I would still like to read a book whose protagonist is not only flawed but a real villain at that. Could you suggest one?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s